How the tapestry of As I Lay Dying's narrative perfects the hero's journey
In As I Lay Dying, we see the Bundrens under scrutiny by a myriad of perspectives, each one a testament to the absolute absurdity of the situation that the protagonists find themselves in. Faulkner, in using this set of incredibly varied perspective is able to provide a foil to the main cast at any moment without needing to formally introduce consistently new characters, as well as allowing for Faulkner's characterization- the most striking part of his work, as well as most modernist literature- to shine through.
The very first chapter of AILD introduces us to Darl, the main narrator of the story. He provides an almost omniscient view of the world around him, hence Faulkner's preference for using him. Moreover, Darl's chapters are very emotionally charged. Faulkner, through Darl as well as other characters, can portray the more emotionally charged rendition of events with Darl as the narrator, and once readers have been hooked in and processed the depth and gravity of events can loop back to a simpler narrator (such as Tull, or Armstid) to provide what context may have been missed from Darl's confusing, but highly poetic language. Darl gives Faulkner the full ability to go more in-depth with how the world is felt rather than seen as a more traditional author might write. Moreover, due to his omniscience his chapters provide great rereadability, where one can find that Darl seems to understand everything all along.
This varied perspective also helps the story as a tale of a Hero's Journey. For one example, you can find Anse: While he may seem like he is insidiously manipulating those around him to get what he wants, when you read his narration one finds that Anse, while foolish and ineffectual, does truly believe that what he is doing is in the right. He has a genuine belief in what he does, and while Anse is a hard character to sympathize with it at least rationalizes his actions. Compare this to Jewel, who, in his only chapter we can see the violent way he expresses his love. This characterization allows us to see him as a more heroic character throughout the book, even when he is beating on his horse and cursing. We know that even if through another character's eyes he may seem like a violent, cruel man, his actual intentions vary vastly from that.
The way the interplay of these two things go hand in hand is how we are delivered a compelling narrative, in terms of the hero's journey. The ability of the journey to be told in any order is taken by Faulkner to its logical extreme, as the perspective, time, and space warp from narrator to narrator. In a way, many characters seem to follow the journey as well. Each character, while given the same call to adventure and physically traveling on the same journey, all have vastly different undertakings in the way they accomplish these things. For example, while Jewel and Darl find themselves fully devoted to the quest of delivering Addie to her resting place, all others on the journey have their own temptations (bananas, delivering cakes, new teeth, a graphophone, an abortion) which influence how the journey progresses for them and how much they are willing to sacrifice.
As I Lay Dying is a satirical reimagining of the Hero's Journey. The use of many narrators allows for the Bundrens to be seen through the lens of their more simple neighbors, as well as revealing many of their own intentions for undertaking this trek, beyond merely burying Addie. By preventing too much focus from falling on a single character, it muddles further who is the hero of this journey. That muddling makes it much more compelling, as the Bundrens, despite their varying temptations begin to function as one cohesive unit, propelling themselves towards Jefferson in spite of all the odds pointed against them.
Nice Job David! I think it is very interesting how you analyzed Darl, Anse, and the overall progression of narrators. I personally thought Darl was more removed and had less emotion. However I do agree that Anse seems to be genuine in his actions and fully believes what he is doing is correct. Overall, great post!
ReplyDeleteGreat Job David! I found it interesting how you analyzed Darl's langauge as a 'felt' narrative rather than a 'seen' one. There's alot of mental and emotional nuance to his character which some might percieve as a lack of emotion, but I appreciate the light you shed on his somewhat hidden motives and desires!
ReplyDeleteHey David! This is a really compelling take on As I Lay Dying. I like how you frame the novel as a satirical reimagining of the Hero's Journey. Your analysis of how Faulkner uses shifting narration to both deepen characterization and disrupt traditional storytelling is spot on. It’s fascinating how the Bundrens, as flawed and individualistic as they are, still manage to form a sort of collective "hero" by the end. The way you tie their personal motives to archetypal temptations really brings the whole journey into sharper focus. Great insights!
ReplyDeleteGreat post David! I like your analysis as it focuses on Faulkner's use of fragmented/multiple perspectives and manipulation of time throughout As I Lay Dying. Narrated through perspectives of the Bundrens, their neighbors, and even strangers, Faulkner details the societal and religious perspective of the Bundrens while recording family's internal dynamics and conflicts. Using flashbacks and other techniques to manipulate the chronology of the story, he exposes Addie's sinfulness and the critiques the family's blind faith in her. There are many interesting aspects to the narration and chronology of the story, and I like that your blog post explores them.
ReplyDeleteHi David, I really enjoyed this interpretation of As I Lay Dying in the context of the Hero's journey. There's no doubt As I Lay Dying is a work of satire and even morbid humor, and the connection of this key motif to the Hero's Journey is laid out excellently here. And of course, the use of stream-of-consciousness with all the character's perspectives only makes the narrative more compelling.
ReplyDeleteHey David! I really like how you point out the irony in the fact Faulker made Jewel and Anse both pretty bad heroes but for opposite reasons. I was a little confused by why you said this was "perfecting" the hero's journey, but I totally get how it's making fun of it. Faulker really takes it to the extreme!
ReplyDeleteI really like the comment you made in the final paragraph about the multiple perspectives muddling the identity of the hero, yet making the story overall more compelling. I strongly agree with this statement. I think the narrator inconsistency shifts the focus away from the "hero" aspect and reassigns it to the "journey". There is a unifying journey to bury Addie and then many diverging quests for numerous personal desires. Each of these journeys have their own central figure, but the narrative at large claims no individual character as its hero.
ReplyDelete